Simply Voting vs. NemoVote: Which Online Voting Tool Is Better?

Choosing the right online voting software is more important than ever. Whether you’re running an association vote, a university election, a cooperative assembly, or a corporate decision-making process, your platform needs to be secure, intuitive, reliable, and cost-effective.

Simply Voting and NemoVote are two popular options on the market: but while both platforms help organizations modernize how they vote, they differ significantly in flexibility, pricing, security standards, and ease of use.

In this guide, we take a deep look at both tools, compare their features side by side, and highlight why many organizations ultimately decide that NemoVote is the more powerful and future-proof choice.

Let’s get started.        

Quick insights:

• NemoVote delivers a faster and more modern voting experience, while Simply Voting follows a more traditional step-by-step setup.

• Pricing transparency is clearer with NemoVote: Simply Voting often requires custom quotes depending on the election type and channels.

• NemoVote provides stronger real-time features, including live quorum tracking, motion voting, and hybrid meeting tools.

• Security is more detailed and publicly documented with NemoVote, including ISO-certified EU hosting.

• NemoVote offers a smoother administrator workflow, making it better suited for NGOs, associations, universities, and hybrid assemblies

Looking for more comparisons? See how NemoVote performs against ElectionBuddy and POLYAS. 

Chapter

1. Simply Voting: core features
2. Challanges of Simply Voting
3. Why many organizations prefer NemoVote
4. NemoVote security overview
5. High-performance architecture
6. Transparent pricing and cost efficiency
7. Long-term data access and compliance
8. Global trust and reputation 
9. Final comparison and recommendation

1. What Simply Voting offers

Simply Voting is a long-established online voting platform based in Canada. Known for its clear design and range of voting methods (including telephone and postal voting), it is a reliable choice for many associations and government-related organizations.

Here are the key strengths of Simply Voting:

User-friendly interface

Simply Voting receives a strong user rating on Capterra (4.9/5). However, this score is based on only around 23 reviews, which is not enough to draw fully reliable conclusions about long-term user satisfaction. Still, reviewers regularly highlight the clean layout, structured dashboards, and straightforward setup steps. In comparison, NemoVote currently holds a 4.8/5 user-friendliness score based on 66 reviews, offering a broader and more representative feedback base. 

Multiple voting channels

Platforms can integrate:

• Internet voting
• Telephone voting
• Paper/mail ballots
• Hybrid voting setups

This flexibility makes it suitable for organizations with diverse membership structures or accessibility needs.

Clear process flow

The platform follows a very straightforward and linear process: administrators create the election, voters cast their ballots, and results are generated at the end. This simple flow helps organizations run elections without confusion or unnecessary steps.

Managed election services

For organizations wanting a hands-off approach, Simply Voting provides:

• A dedicated project manager
• Branding setup
• Password distribution
• Ballot creation
• Postal mailings
• Monitoring during the election
• Final audit trail & results

This is helpful, but it also comes at an additional cost.

Who uses Simply Voting?

Simply Voting works with:

• Professional associations
• Education & universities
• Governments
• Cooperatives
• HOAs
• Corporations
• First Nations
• Sports clubs
• Membership organizations

This is similar to NemoVote’s target groups: but NemoVote offers more scalability, automation, and modern workflows.

2. Simply Voting also shows clear challenges

This part is important for a balanced comparison: and also where NemoVote stands out strongly.

For a quick overview of how Simply Voting ranks among other voting tools, you can check the Simply Voting section in our comparison article here.

No ISO certifications

• GDPR-compliance
• BUT: no ISO 27001, 27017, or 27018 certifications
• Only partial EU hosting

For European organizations (public institutions, healthcare, unions, chambers, cooperatives), this can be a deal-breaker.

Many premium features cost extra

• Weighted voting
• Segmentation
• Online nominations
• Telephone voting
• Paper ballots
• Managed elections

All come with additional fees.

No long-term access

If you choose the self-service election model, you only get:

• Access during the event
• No data storage afterwards
• No long-term audit space unless you pay extra

This is a big disadvantage for associations needing compliance documentation.

3. Why more organizations choose NemoVote

Now let’s break down why NemoVote is increasingly the preferred choice for universities, associations, cooperatives, NGOs, political parties, chambers, and corporations.

NemoVote focuses on modern digital governance, combining advanced security, intuitive design, real-time technology, and flexible pricing.

Modern, intuitive, and extremely easy to use

NemoVote is built for organizations that want:

• A clean dashboard
• A simple voting setup
• No technical expertise required

Users consistently say NemoVote is the easiest voting tool on the market: from voters to administrators.

Unlike Simply Voting, NemoVote does not provide telephone or postal mail voting. Instead, it focuses on secure digital authentication through email login and QR-code access, which aligns with modern online voting standards.

4. Enterprise-level security (EU-only hosting + multiple ISO certifications)

This is one of the biggest advantages.

NemoVote security features provide:

• ISO 27001 (hosting) – Information security management
• ISO 27017 (hosting) – Cloud security
• ISO 27018 (hosting) – Protection of personal data in the cloud
• Hosting exclusively in Germany/EU
• Full GDPR compliance
• AES-256 encryption for all data
  
• Separation of identity & vote

Simply Voting only shows GDPR-compliance and SOC2 Type I: but not the ISO standards that many European institutions require.

 5. Real-time, high-performance infrastructure

NemoVote uses modern event-driven architecture:

• Instant vote processing
• Live results (if enabled)
• Real-time quorum tracking
• Secure participation monitoring
• Scalable to thousands of voters

This makes NemoVote ideal for:

• Large general assemblies
• National congresses
• Political party conventions
• University elections
• Global organizations

Simply Voting’s infrastructure is strong but more traditional.

6. Pricing transparency and cost efficiency

Simply Voting Pricing (per election)

• 50 voters → $200
• 100 voters → $200
• 500 voters → $300
• 1,000 voters → $500
• 10,000 voters → $1.860

This makes Simply Voting expensive, especially for organizations running multiple elections per year.

NemoVote Pricing Options

• Event Model (unlimited elections during the event timeframe)

Perfect for organizations holding 1–2 election days per year.
During the booked timeframe (usually one day), you can run unlimited votes, ballots, and motions.

• 50 voters → $119
• 100 voters → $155
• 500 voters → $435
• 1,000 voters → $789
• 10,000 voters → $1.499

This is cheaper than Simply Voting for mid-size and large events.

• Subscription (unlimited elections)

Perfect for organizations running more than two elections per year.

Examples:

• 50 voters → $36,83/month
• 100 voters → $47,67/month
• 500 voters → $134/month
• 1,000 voters → $242/month
• 10,000 voters → $449/month

Unlimited elections + full data storage + white-label included.

Pricing Conclusion

If you run:

• 1–2 elections per year → NemoVote event model is cheaper.
• 3+ elections per year → NemoVote subscription is dramatically cheaper.

Simply Voting quickly becomes expensive, especially with add-ons.

7. Better long-term access and compliance

NemoVote includes:

• Permanent data storage
• Downloadable audit-proof PDFs
• Archiving
• Logging
• Role-based access control
• Unlimited history

Simply Voting’s basic model does not store your data long-term.

8. Trusted by global organizations

NemoVote is used by:

• International federations
• NGOs
• Schools and universities
• Cooperatives
• International federations

This highlights the platform’s scalability and reliability for high-stakes voting.

9. Final verdict: why NemoVote offers better value for modern organizations

Simply Voting is a solid platform with a long track record and good user ratings. It’s particularly helpful for organizations that rely heavily on telephone or postal voting or need fully managed election services.

However, when comparing the platforms feature-by-feature, NemoVote emerges as the stronger and more future-proof solution: especially for organizations that want secure, modern, scalable, and cost-efficient digital voting.

Why NemoVote wins overall:

If your organization wants to modernize its election processes, reduce administrative workload, and ensure secure and legally compliant online voting, NemoVote is the clear winner.

Ready to try it yourself?

Start a free test election in NemoVote.