Best Online Voting Platforms 2025 Reviewed

2nd Place: Simply Voting

Headquarters: Canada
Cost for 100 voters: approx. €170 per election

Simply Voting is a proven solution that stands out with its user-friendly interface and flexible voting methods. Particularly suitable for associations, NGOs, and educational institutions, it offers a solid security foundation and practical features.

🟢 Advantages of User-Friendliness

The very good rating of 4.9 on Capterra shows the high satisfaction of users; however, there are currently only around 20 reviews.

• Clear and well-structured interface makes election preparation quick and easy

• Good customer support and helpful documentation

• Available in 17 languages

• Suitable for organizations with standard requirements

🟡 Security & Certifications with Potential

Simply Voting scores 3 out of 5 points for security. While it offers GDPR-compliant hosting and encrypted data, it does not have any official ISO certification.

• Partial hosting in EU data centers ensures data protection

• No formal ISO certificates, which may be a disadvantage for sensitive election processes

🟢 Versatile Range of Functions

The platform scores 4 out of 5 points, as it offers many important voting features but is somewhat limited for more complex elections.

• Support for various voting methods, including multiple-choice voting

• Quorum monitoring ensures valid election processes

• Basic accessibility in accordance with BITV/WCAG

• Customizable ballot design with images and free-text descriptions

• Test election function provides security during preparation

🟢 Price-Performance: Transparent but More Expensive

The pricing model receives 4 out of 5 points because it is fair, but many additional features often come at extra cost, making the overall price usually higher than that of other providers.

• Pricing is generally higher than NemoVote, with base rates starting at around €170 for 100 voters

• Less attractive for smaller organizations

• Simple licensing model, no subscription available

Special Features

Simply Voting stands out for its easy setup, wide range of voting methods, and solid support — particularly for small to medium-sized organizations.

• Fast and simple election preparation

• Telephone and postal voting can also be integrated

• Less suitable for complex and highly secure election processes

3rd Place: Assembly Voting

Headquarters: Denmark
Cost for 100 voters: Prices not public, available upon request

Assembly Voting, headquartered in Denmark, is an established online voting platform specializing in secure and verifiable election solutions. Since December 2024, as part of the Lumi Global Group, the platform benefits from a strong international infrastructure.

🟡 User-Friendliness (4.1/5)

The rating is based on a small number of user reviews (10), praising the functional interface, though it requires some initial familiarization.

• Modern but partly complex interface

• Well suited for experienced administrators

• Support and documentation still have room for improvement

🟢 Security & Certifications (4/5)

Assembly Voting is GDPR-compliant and offers ISO 27001-certified hosting in Europe via Microsoft Azure. However, there is limited publicly available information regarding security audits.

• ISO 27001-certified hosting in Microsoft Azure

• GDPR compliance ensured

• Limited transparency on penetration tests and security audits

🟢 Comprehensive Range of Functions (4/5)

The platform covers a wide range of election features, including vote weighting and quorum monitoring, though there is room for improvement in terms of accessibility.

• Flexible voting methods and vote weighting

• Real-time quorum and result monitoring

• Partially limited accessibility

🔴 Price-Performance (2/5)

The pricing structure is not publicly available and is provided individually upon request, making comparison and cost estimation difficult.

• No public price lists available

• Custom pricing based on customer requirements

• Lacks transparency for cost-conscious organizations

Special Features

Assembly Voting benefits from end-to-end encryption of election data as well as from its integration into Lumi Global, which strengthens its global presence and support capabilities.

5th Place: Eligo Voting

Headquarters: Italy
Cost for 100 voters: Prices unclear, exact details available only on request.

Eligo is a modern solution for large organizations and companies that place particularly high demands on data protection and compliance. The platform combines security with a scalable range of functions and is aimed at users with complex voting processes.

🟢 Advantages of User-Friendliness

The rating of 4.7 is based on 108 user reviews, praising the clear and modern interface.

• Clearly structured, modern interface

• Scalable for large organizations

• Currently available only in Italian and English

🟢 Security & Certifications

🟡 Extensive Range of Functions

With 3 out of 5 points, Eligo offers many important features, including audit logs and flexible vote weighting. However, some customization options are missing compared to top providers, and even after thorough research, questions remain about certain key functions.

• Comprehensive auditability and traceability

• Flexible vote weighting and role management

• Unclear how the ballot is created and which functions are available for it

🔴 Price-Performance: Less Transparent

The rating of 2 points reflects that prices are not publicly accessible and mostly available only upon request, which makes comparison difficult and always requires customers to communicate directly with the voting provider. Simple self-service is therefore not possible.

• Prices not clearly visible

• Individual offers only on request

• Suitable for organizations with presumably high budgets and demanding requirements

Special Features

Eligo stands out for its strong focus on data protection and compliance and is particularly suitable for large companies in Italy with complex voting processes.

6th Place: AssociationVoting

Headquarters: USA
Cost for 100 voters: approx. €75 in the basic version. Many functions need to be added individually.

AssociationVoting is primarily aimed at associations and organizations with complex memberships. The platform offers a wide range of voting options and focuses on adaptability and different member lists to meet individual statutes.

🟢 Advantages of User-Friendliness (4.7/5)

• Intuitive operation with a well-structured interface

• Personalized ballots for different member groups

• Support for large and complex membership structures

🔴 Security & Certificates (2/5)

Due to hosting on Google servers in the USA and the lack of ISO certification and transparency regarding encryption mechanisms, Association Voting receives a limited security rating, which in some cases can raise data protection concerns.

• Not GDPR-compliant

• No ISO certifications

• Lack of transparency regarding encryption mechanisms: the assurance of election integrity cannot be verified based on current information.

🟡 Functionality: Extensive, but More Limited (3/5)

• Support for elections in different groups and differentiated quorum controls

• Limited accessibility, no full BITV/WCAG compliance

• Personalization options for election materials

🔴 Price-Performance: Complex and Not Very Transparent (2/5)

The basic prices are officially available, but many essential functions are paid add-ons, which make the pricing model unnecessarily complicated and often more expensive than competitors.

• Basic functions available at clear prices

• Many important features must be purchased separately

• Complex and costly pricing model

• In many cases, higher overall costs than other providers

Special Features

Ideal for organizations with complex statutes and multiple membership classes, but with significant weaknesses in data protection and cost transparency.

7th Place: Polyas

Headquarters: Germany
Cost for 100 voters: Prices not public, generally higher compared to market average.

Polyas is a German company with comprehensive BSI and ISO 27001 certification, established as a provider of secure and certified online elections. The platform targets organizations that place a high value on security and compliance but comes with partly complex pricing structures and limited functionality.

🔴 User-Friendliness (1/5)

Since Polyas does not have independent user reviews, user-friendliness is difficult to assess. Former users and testers report a more complex operation.

• No independent reviews available

• More complex user interface

• Support and documentation are available but not consistently rated as intuitive

🟢 Security & Certificates (5/5)

Polyas is one of the few companies with its own BSI certification and ISO 27001 certification, ensuring the highest level of security and compliance.

• BSI certification

• ISO 27001 certified company (not just hosting)

• GDPR-compliant processing and data storage in Germany

🟡 Diverse Range of Functions (3/5)

Polyas offers a solid range of functions suitable for standard elections, but lacks flexible customization and modern features common among top providers.

• Supports basic election procedures

• Vote weighting and quorum monitoring

• Limited customization options

🔴 Price-Performance (2/5)

Polyas’ pricing structure is not transparent and is considered relatively high by users, which limits cost efficiency for many organizations.

• No public price information

• Perceived as expensive compared to competitors

• Additional features quickly lead to higher total costs

Special Features

Polyas stands out for its top-level security standards with BSI and ISO certifications, but its user-friendliness and pricing transparency leave room for improvement. It is often booked together with associated election managers, which increases the total cost.

8th Place: Lumi

Headquarters: UK
Cost for 100 voters: Prices not public, only available as a full-service option, often described as very high

Lumi is an online voting platform that focuses mainly on fully managed election processes (Full-Service). The solution targets organizations that want extensive service support but has limitations in self-service and pricing transparency.

🔴 User-Friendliness (1/5)

There are no independent user reviews for Lumi, making it difficult to assess user-friendliness.

• No verified reviews available

• No self-service, since it’s a full-service model

• Training effort unclear

🟡 Security & Certificates (3/5)

Lumi uses ISO 27001-hosted servers and is GDPR-compliant. However, there is a lack of detailed information about the applied technologies and security measures.

• ISO 27001 certified hosting

• GDPR compliant

• Limited transparency about security measures

🟡 Diverse Functionality (3/5)

🔴 Price-Performance (1/5)

Lumi offers only full-service elections, which are associated with high costs, and its pricing model is non-transparent, making it expensive for many organizations.

• No publicly visible prices

• Only full-service, no self-service available

• Customers report high prices

• Price comparison hardly possible

Special Features

9th Place: OpaVote

Headquarters: USA
Cost for 100 voters: €8.50

OpaVote is an online voting platform from the USA that stands out mainly for its low costs. The platform offers numerous voting methods but, despite its functional interface, appears rather technical and not very user-friendly.

🟠 User-Friendliness (2/5)

Although there are no independent reviews available, we were able to test OpaVote in an open trial. The interface is functional but quite technical and requires some familiarization. Many voting methods can be selected directly; however, this requires users to know the correct methods and their terminology.

• No independent user reviews; shows a technical, less intuitive interface

• Scores with the open test: immediately available for everyone

• Many voting options, but knowledge of voting methods required

🔴 Security & Certificates (1/5)

OpaVote is not GDPR-compliant, is based in the USA, has no ISO certifications, and provides no detailed information about its security technology.

• No GDPR-compliant hosting

• No ISO certifications

• Little transparency regarding security measures

🟢 Price-Performance (4/5)

For its limited range of features, OpaVote offers a very cost-effective solution, which can be particularly attractive for small organizations with a low budget.

• Very low costs

• Functional despite a reduced feature set

• High price-performance ratio compared to others

Special Features

• Many voting methods available

• Easy to use for technically skilled users

• Outdated design

10th Place: uniWAHL

Headquarters: Germany
Cost for 100 voters: Prices not public and available upon request

uniWAHL is an online voting platform focused on universities and colleges, but it struggles with an outdated design and limited functionality. The solution provides basic security through German hosting and ISO 27001 certification but shows weaknesses in user-friendliness and feature diversity.

🔴 User-Friendliness (1/5)

As there are no independent reviews and the platform has a very outdated design, user-friendliness is severely limited.

• No verified user reviews

• Outdated and not very intuitive interface

• Low usability for voters and administrators

🟡 Security & Certificates (3/5)

uniWAHL offers GDPR-compliant hosting in Germany and is ISO 27001 certified. However, there are no options for auditing or verification of election results.

• GDPR-compliant hosting in Germany

• ISO 27001 certified hosting

• No official auditability of elections

🟠 Functionality (2/5)

The platform provides limited functionality, which may be sufficient for simple university elections, but lacks advanced voting methods and customization options.

• Basic voting functions without special features

• No extensions for more complex election processes

• Limited customization options for ballots and evaluations

🔴 Price-Performance (1/5)

The prices are not publicly available, and the limited functionality combined with a lack of transparency results in a poor price-performance ratio.

• No clear price information

• Limited services compared to the market

• Not suitable for budget-conscious organizations or complex elections

Special Features

uniWAHL is mainly used at universities but offers few modern features and has an outdated user interface.

Summary: Best Online Voting Tool 2025 NemoVote

In the extensive comparison of the top 10 online voting platforms, NemoVote stands out as the clear test winner thanks to its combination of user-friendliness, high security, extensive functionality, and transparent pricing. While some alternatives offer solid performance, only a few combine all these aspects as effectively as NemoVote.

• User-Friendliness: NemoVote impresses with the easiest interface that ensures smooth operation for both administrators and voters.

• Security & Compliance: With ISO 27001 certified hosting in Germany, or for US-customers in the US and full GDPR compliance, NemoVote is one of the most secure choices for handling sensitive election data.

• Extensive Functionality: NemoVotes money-back guarantee promises to enable any election to be carried out online. From sealed elections and multilingual support to detailed quorum tracking and customizable voting processes, NemoVote flexibly adapts to the statutes and requirements of every organization.

• Transparent Pricing: With clearly calculable and fair costs, NemoVote offers significant value for organizations of all sizes.

Other providers like Simply Voting and Eligo offer solid alternatives with limitations - whether in terms of pricing structure, security certifications, or user-friendliness. Providers ranked lower often suffer from a lack of transparency, outdated user interfaces, or limited functionality.

Choosing the right online voting platform is crucial for the success and legal security of any election. NemoVote stands out through its combination of simplicity, security, and flexibility, making it the trusted choice for associations, universities, trade unions, political parties, and many other organizations.