Choosing the right online voting software is more important than ever. Whether you’re running an association vote, a university election, a cooperative assembly, or a corporate decision-making process, your platform needs to be secure, intuitive, reliable, and cost-effective.
Simply Voting and NemoVote are two popular options on the market: but while both platforms help organizations modernize how they vote, they differ significantly in flexibility, pricing, security standards, and ease of use.
In this guide, we take a deep look at both tools, compare their features side by side, and highlight why many organizations ultimately decide that NemoVote is the more powerful and future-proof choice.
Let’s get started.
NemoVote delivers a faster and more modern voting experience, while Simply Voting follows a more traditional step-by-step setup.
Pricing transparency is clearer with NemoVote: Simply Voting often requires custom quotes depending on the election type and channels.
NemoVote provides stronger real-time features, including live quorum tracking, motion voting, and hybrid meeting tools.
Security is more detailed and publicly documented with NemoVote, including ISO-certified EU hosting.
NemoVote offers a smoother administrator workflow, making it better suited for NGOs, associations, universities, and hybrid assemblies
Looking for more comparisons? See how NemoVote performs against ElectionBuddy and POLYAS.
Simply Voting is a long-established online voting platform based in Canada. Known for its clear design and range of voting methods (including telephone and postal voting), it is a reliable choice for many associations and government-related organizations.
Here are the key strengths of Simply Voting:
User-friendly interface
Simply Voting receives a strong user rating on Capterra (4.9/5). However, this score is based on only around 23 reviews, which is not enough to draw fully reliable conclusions about long-term user satisfaction. Still, reviewers regularly highlight the clean layout, structured dashboards, and straightforward setup steps. In comparison, NemoVote currently holds a 4.8/5 user-friendliness score based on 66 reviews, offering a broader and more representative feedback base.
Multiple voting channels
Platforms can integrate:
This flexibility makes it suitable for organizations with diverse membership structures or accessibility needs.
Clear process flow
The platform follows a very straightforward and linear process: administrators create the election, voters cast their ballots, and results are generated at the end. This simple flow helps organizations run elections without confusion or unnecessary steps.
For organizations wanting a hands-off approach, Simply Voting provides:
This is helpful, but it also comes at an additional cost.
Simply Voting works with:
This is similar to NemoVote’s target groups: but NemoVote offers more scalability, automation, and modern workflows.
This part is important for a balanced comparison: and also where NemoVote stands out strongly.
For a quick overview of how Simply Voting ranks among other voting tools, you can check the Simply Voting section in our comparison article here.
For European organizations (public institutions, healthcare, unions, chambers, cooperatives), this can be a deal-breaker.
All come with additional fees.
If you choose the self-service election model, you only get:
This is a big disadvantage for associations needing compliance documentation.
Now let’s break down why NemoVote is increasingly the preferred choice for universities, associations, cooperatives, NGOs, political parties, chambers, and corporations.
NemoVote focuses on modern digital governance, combining advanced security, intuitive design, real-time technology, and flexible pricing.
NemoVote is built for organizations that want:
Users consistently say NemoVote is the easiest voting tool on the market: from voters to administrators.
Unlike Simply Voting, NemoVote does not provide telephone or postal mail voting. Instead, it focuses on secure digital authentication through email login and QR-code access, which aligns with modern online voting standards.
This is one of the biggest advantages.
NemoVote security features provide:
Simply Voting only shows GDPR-compliance and SOC2 Type I: but not the ISO standards that many European institutions require.
NemoVote uses modern event-driven architecture:
This makes NemoVote ideal for:
Simply Voting’s infrastructure is strong but more traditional.
This makes Simply Voting expensive, especially for organizations running multiple elections per year.
Perfect for organizations holding 1–2 election days per year.
During the booked timeframe (usually one day), you can run unlimited votes, ballots, and motions.
This is cheaper than Simply Voting for mid-size and large events.
Perfect for organizations running more than two elections per year.
Examples:
Unlimited elections + full data storage + white-label included.
If you run:
Simply Voting quickly becomes expensive, especially with add-ons.
NemoVote includes:
Simply Voting’s basic model does not store your data long-term.
NemoVote is used by:
This highlights the platform’s scalability and reliability for high-stakes voting.
Simply Voting is a solid platform with a long track record and good user ratings. It’s particularly helpful for organizations that rely heavily on telephone or postal voting or need fully managed election services.
However, when comparing the platforms feature-by-feature, NemoVote emerges as the stronger and more future-proof solution: especially for organizations that want secure, modern, scalable, and cost-efficient digital voting.
| Area | Why NemoVote wins |
| Security and compliance | Stronger security with EU-only hosting and multiple ISO certifications |
| Pricing | More affordable pricing for both single and repeated elections |
| Features | More features included without extra fees or add-ons |
| Usability | Simpler, more intuitive user experience for admins and voters |
| Scalability | Better scalability for large assemblies, congresses, and complex elections |
| Control and transparency | PDF archiving, and role-based access for admins |
| Branding | White-label customization (logos, colors) included |
| Social Proof | Trusted by global medical and sports federations |
If your organization wants to modernize its election processes, reduce administrative workload, and ensure secure and legally compliant online voting, NemoVote is the clear winner.
Start a free test election in NemoVote.