Are you looking for an ElectionBuddy alternative that is powerful, secure, and still easy to use?...
Are you looking for an online voting tool that is not only secure, but also simple, flexible, and fast to set up?
Then NemoVote might be exactly what you need.
In this comparison, we take a close look at POLYAS, one of the most established players in the industry, and NemoVote, the modern, lightweight alternative designed for associations, universities, NGOs, and companies that want intuitive and compliant online voting: without unnecessary complexity.
Let’s get started!
Quick insights:
-
NemoVote is the most intuitive tool, while POLYAS is more complex to set up.
-
Pricing is clearer with NemoVote: POLYAS shows only base prices without features or service.
-
Both platforms are German-made and GDPR-compliant, but NemoVote offers easier access.
-
NemoVote provides a smoother hybrid & online experience, including support for 10 languages.
-
Trusted by thousands of organisations in 32 countries, NemoVote works for NGOs, unions, universities, and European Works Councils.
- POLYAS is BSI-certified, however this is not relevant for most organizations, as this is only legally required for elections like the german social election 2029.
- POLYAS and NemoVote both host their online voting systems on ISO-27001 certified data centers.
Looking for more comparisons? See how NemoVote performs against ElectionBuddy in our detailed breakdown.
Chapter
- What POLYAS offers
- User-friendliness: NemoVote offers the easiest online voting experience
- Transparent pricing no hidden fees
- Built for real-time governance, not bureaucracy
- Modern security & full GDPR compliance
- Better experience for hybrid & remote voting
- Trusted by thousands of organisations in 32 countries worldwide
- Verdict: Which one should you choose?
- Overall winner for most organizations: NemoVote
1. What POLYAS offers
POLYAS is a long-established online voting provider, widely used for formal and regulation-heavy elections in Europe. It supports online, live, hybrid, and postal voting and offers different CORE systems for verifiable or certified election requirements. For large institutions with strict processes, POLYAS delivers the technical depth they need.
However, several limitations become noticeable for many organizations:
-
Base prices exclude core features, making total costs higher
-
Setup and configuration can feel complex, especially in self-service
-
Many features require manual activation or depend on specific CORE versions
-
Less intuitive interface compared to newer tools
-
Limited language options
-
Hybrid workflows can require additional coordination
POLYAS remains a solid option for highly formal elections, but many teams look for a more intuitive platform with simpler handling and clearer pricing or a broader market overview, you can also explore our full comparison of leading online voting tools in the Online Voting Software Comparison 2025.
That’s where NemoVote becomes a strong fit.
2. User-friendliness: NemoVote offers the easiest online voting experience
NemoVote is known as the most intuitive voting platforms on the market. This is especially important for elections in self-service.
Admins can:
- set up a vote within minutes,
- add documents or contextual notes,
- track quorum live,
- manage everything from one dashboard.
Voters love the clean interface, and hybrid/remote participants can join instantly from any device: without complex logins or multi-step processes.
POLYAS, on the other hand, requires navigating CORE versions, feature settings, and sometimes manual activation via support.
Why administrators prefer it
Ease of use is one of the strongest reasons why organizations consistently choose NemoVote over POLYAS. With NemoVote, anyone can set up and run an election instantly.
Even without prior experience, administrators can navigate the platform smoothly, while still having access to:
-
A full knowledge base
-
YouTube tutorials
-
Live support whenever needed
POLYAS, in contrast, is widely described as:
-
Unintuitive and difficult to grasp
-
Time-consuming to set up
- Requiring administrators to figure out many workflows manually
Many administrators report spending days learning the system and trying to configure basic settings. NemoVote typically takes only minutes: even for first-time users.
A feature admins love: ultra-fast user upload
One of the most appreciated NemoVote features is the one-minute user upload:
-
Organizations can import 10,000+ members from an Excel list
-
The upload completes in under 60 seconds
In POLYAS, administrators often need hours just to understand where and how member data must be added: slowing down the election prep process significantly.
3. Transparent pricing with no hidden fees
NemoVote keeps pricing simple and clear: and unlike POLYAS, all core features are included from the start.
POLYAS base prices:
(Features & support not included: and most of the time, additional modules or support packages come at extra cost.)
- 75 voters → €146,84+
- 350 voters → €445,09+
- 10,000 voters → €6.798,12+
NemoVote prices (All essential features included):
75 voters
- Subscription: €40,50 / month
- One-time event: €129
350 voters
- Subscription: €85,50 / month
- One-time event: €279
10,000 voters
- Subscription: €382.50 / month
- One-time event: €1.269
Key takeaway:
NemoVote remains significantly more affordable than POLYAS while offering all core features by default: whereas the listed POLYAS prices are only entry prices that often increase due to required add-ons or module upgrades.
You can also check your exact costs using the NemoVote Pricing Calculator here.
4. Built for real-time governance, not bureaucracy
With NemoVote, organizations can vote live during meetings or asynchronously before, during, or after an assembly.
Everything happens in real time:
- quorum validation
- participation tracking
- instant encrypted results
- audit logs
- decision records in PDF
This makes NemoVote ideal for boards, universities, committees, clubs, and NGOs.
POLYAS Live Voting also supports real-time voting: but setup is more complex and often requires support packages or manual activation.
5. Modern security & full GDPR compliance
NemoVote provides enterprise-level protection without complicating the admin experience.
Security includes:
- AES-256 encrypted votes
- GDPR-compliant EU hosting
- identity & ballot separation
- audit logging
- strict access permissions
- ISO 27001 / 27017 / 27018 certified data center hosting
See NemoVote’s full security documentation here.
POLYAS is strong on security as well: but again, which security level you get depends on which CORE version you choose.
6. Better experience for hybrid & remote voting
NemoVote is designed for modern governance: 
- remote-friendly
- mobile access
- accessible interfaces
- real-time communication tools
- perfect for global teams
Voters can participate instantly: no lengthy credential distribution or multi-step login processes. NemoVote uses secure magic links that allow voters to join and vote with just two clicks, while maintaining full security. The platform also supports 10 languages for both voters and administrators.
Learn more about NemoVote’s hybrid & remote voting tools here.
7. Trusted by thousands of organizations in 32 countries worldwide
NemoVote is used by:
- NGOs from 20 to 20,000 voters like Forum Train Europe
- Worldwide renown organisations like World Sailing or World Medical Association
- Unions with 10,000+ live voters like the German UFO
- Universities and Schools like GO!
- European Work Councils like Accenture
The platform supports both simple and highly structured votes with ease.
8. Verdict: Which one should you choose?
Choose POLYAS if…
- your organization requires BSI-certified political-grade processes
- you have the budget and staff to manage a complex system
Choose NemoVote if…
- you want a modern, easy, and intuitive platform
- you run assemblies, board meetings, member votes, student elections, or NGO ballots
- you value transparent pricing
- you want strong security without complexity
- you need fast setup, remote participation, and real-time results
Overall winner for most organizations: NemoVote
Modern organizations need simplicity, flexibility, and transparency.
NemoVote delivers all three: with clear pricing, intuitive design, and enterprise-grade security.
If your organization wants secure, GDPR-compliant voting without the bureaucracy of heavyweight systems, NemoVote is the better choice.
Ready to try it yourself?
Start a free test election in NemoVote.